OUR GOLD MEDAL SPONSORS
MDdata
MDdata is a physician-led life care planning company that provides medical cost projections, record reviews, and future care plans to help attorneys evaluate injuries and determine long-term healthcare costs for legal cases.
Physician Life Care Planning (PLCP)
PLCP provides physician-led life care planning and damages valuation services while offering training, education, and professional development opportunities for clinicians entering the medicolegal life care planning field.
AAACEUs
AAACEUs is an online continuing education provider that delivers ICHCC-approved training programs, including CLCP, MSCC, and CMCPS coursework, as well as CEU subscriptions that prepare professionals for certification and recertification in life care planning and related healthcare specialties.
A-CLCP
A-CLCP is an exclusive membership organization for CLCP and CCLCP professionals, offering networking, professional recognition, continuing educational opportunities and resources that support excellence in life care planning.
Feature: Epidural Steroid Injections
Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) remain one of the most frequently projected procedures in Medical Cost Projections (MCPs) and Life Care Plans (LCPs). However, nonspecific documentation, such as simply noting “ESI”, can result in coding ambiguity, inaccurate cost assignments, and weakened defensibility in litigation or settlement contexts. This column provides a practical, code-neutral approach to identifying the correct procedural pathway, improving cost consistency, and strengthening the overall reliability of projected care estimates.
Step 1: Identify the Approach
Accurate reporting begins with defining the approach: transforaminal or interlaminar (which includes a caudal route). Each approach corresponds to a unique set of procedural categories, and this distinction must be clear in both clinical documentation and cost modeling.
After defining the approach, specify the spinal region involved: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral. Together, the route and region determine the correct code family and the corresponding reimbursement range (American Medical Association, 2024).
Step 2: Determine Imaging Use and Levels
For interlaminar injections
Indicate whether imaging guidance (fluoroscopy, CT, or ultrasound) is used. Some procedural categories incorporate imaging by definition, while others differentiate between services performed “with” versus “without” it. Imaging inclusion influences both procedural selection and valuation.
For transforaminal injections
Document laterality (unilateral or bilateral) and the number of spinal levels treated. When injections are performed on both sides of the same vertebral interspace, bilateral reporting rules apply, typically warranting a 150% pricing adjustment to reflect the additional work.
For multiple levels, add-on logic applies for each additional interspace treated.
Step 3: Identify the Injected Agents
Detail the therapeutic agent(s) administered; whether anesthetic, corticosteroid, opioid, or antispasmodic. Local anesthetics such as lidocaine or bupivacaine are generally considered integral to the service, but therapeutic or neurolytic agents (e.g., dexamethasone or morphine sulfate) may require separate cost consideration when itemizing projected care.
Step 4: Consider the Place of Service
The site of service (office, ambulatory surgery center, or hospital outpatient department) has a direct impact on reimbursement. Office-based procedures typically yield lower reimbursement due to bundled overhead, whereas hospital-based procedures incorporate higher facility costs into their fee structures. When modeling cost projections, ensure that the setting used reflects the clinical reality of where the service is expected to occur.
Final notes
Equally important, remember that treating providers are the ultimate source of procedural specificity. They possess the clinical knowledge of laterality, targeted levels, approach, and drug selection; information that may not always be fully reflected in summarized records.
Obtaining these details can occur directly through peer-to-peer discussions or indirectly through a thorough review of prior operative or procedure notes when the patient has undergone the intervention in the past. Integrating this collaborative verification step ensures that the projected codes and costs truly mirror clinical reality.
Key Takeaway
Accuracy in coding and cost modeling depends on clear clinical documentation. To ensure defensible medical cost projections:
-
Define the approach and spinal region
-
Specify laterality, number of levels, and imaging use
-
Include the therapeutic agent administered
-
Confirm the place of service
-
Collaborate with the treating providers to validate procedural details
Accurate documentation leads to accurate coding, and accurate coding supports credible, defensible costs of care.
By Amanda Reikowsky, CMCPS, CPC, CPMA, CDEO, CRC
Columnist, ICHCC Journal
Owner, CodeWise Solutions LLC
Author Note
This column is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The content is based on coding principles and procedural reporting standards established by the American Medical Association (AMA) and other recognized regulatory sources. Procedural codes that correspond to the services described are part of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code set, which is copyright © American Medical Association. These specific code numbers are not reproduced or displayed in this publication to maintain compliance with AMA copyright and licensing requirements.
Readers should note that coding guidelines and interpretations are subject to periodic revision by the AMA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and other governing entities. Users are encouraged to verify the most current guidance and consult official coding manuals or licensed databases when assigning or referencing CPT codes in practice.